There was this huge controversy when the Huang Yong Ping "House of Oracles" exhibition went to Vancouver (from the Walker, I might add) this past spring. In one of Ping's pieces, 'Theatre of the World,' representing both Jeremy Bentham's idealized prison, the Panopticon, and as "a metaphor for the conflicts among different peoples and cultures - in short, human existence itself," he placed a handful of small bugs and reptiles to stand in for us destructive humans.
The SPCA complained, blah blah blah, said the point of the work was to encourage fighting and that there were no simulated natural environments and whipped out The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act Chapter 372 to prove it. They got the opinion of some doctor and the SPCA people to say that the creatures in "Theatre of the World" were officially under 'distress' and issued these orders:
i) Removal of tarantulas and scorpions from the artwork
ii) Increase the humidity (e.g. add plastic liners to 4-5 alcoves)
iii) Increase heat in the evenings
iv) Provide deeper substrate (minimum 2")
v) Monitor weight of the snakes, skinks and toads on a weekly basis to ensure no weight loss, and to remove any species that experience any weight loss.
The Vancouver Art Gallery eventually removed all the creatures and left the empty shell standing. The brilliant Canadian Press had this to say about the piece:
"The installation features millipedes, scorpions, tarantulas, frogs and insects in a simulation of a magic potion produced in ancient China by putting different species of animals together in a jar.
WHAT! WHAT! THIS IS SO STUPID OH MY GOD I HATE THE SPCA AND THE CANADIAN PRESS AND EVERYBODY WHO MAKES A BIG DEAL ABOUT THIS OH MY GOD. "MAGIC POTION PRODUCED IN ANCIENT CHINA" HOLY SHIT.
Other stupid things: The doctor who was appointed by the SPCA to observe the exhibit said he "received advice from the American Zoological Association that any zoo that exhibited the same animals on view in Theater of the World in one display area would risk losing its accreditation because such animals are incompatible and should not be housed together."
OH MY GOD NOW THE ZOOS ARE THE VOICE OF ANIMAL RIGHTS? WHERE IS THE DEBATE OVER ZOOS?
He was also quoted as saying that "in a proper zoological display, you often wouldn't be able to see the animals because they would be hiding. 'That's how you can tell if an exhibit is good or not.'
Um, that's exactly what made headlines in Vancouver for a week - they assumed two toads were missing/dead and then found them HIDING UNDER SOME GRASS.
I was trying to find an article online to link and found this little gem:
Controversial animal art exhibit still at risk. ARE YOU SERIOUS? A picture of two bugs facing each other with the caption: "bugs fight it out?" ARE YOU KIDDING? Seriously - blame Canada.
(P.S. The acronym of Vancouver Art Gallery is "VAG" and it's funny because they use it in press. Funny: "ACCUSATIONS OF ANIMAL CRUELTY BUG VAG")